One Laptop per Child

By | 2007-11-14T14:51:08+00:00 November 14th, 2007|Uncategorized|3 Comments

One Laptop per childThey’re out! And you can help support children in developing countries, by buying one of them. You buy one, and the One Laptop Per Child foundation sends one to a community in a developing country. The cost is only $399 US, and that includes one for you. At Northwest Cadence, we decided to support the project (even though it ships with a version of Linux… grrrrr), and we encourage you to do the same!

The process to buy and give a laptop is very easy. Simply visit or call 1-877-705-2786. You can check out using your credit card or PayPal account. (You can also choose to provide both laptops to children in developing countries, as well.)

Your laptop will be sent to a child in one of the countries listed by the UN as one of the Least Developed Countries in the world.

Don’t expect your laptop to be shipped immediately. In the fine print prior to ordering, the OLPC foundation lets you know that there may be delays in production and shipping of your laptop, and that the priority is the laptops being shipped to the developing countries. However, the real purpose here is to get your contribution out to the developing world as quickly as possible. You’re likely reading this post on a computer with far more processing power (not to mention a far more user friendly OS), so you can wait! 😀

One last thing. T-Mobile has very generously offered free T-Mobile Hotspot access for an entire year. That means you can log in at many locations around the US, most prominently at any Starbucks coffee shop. I have T-Mobile Hotspot and I find it very useful, especially when I’m traveling (or just want to get out of the office for a while).

About the Author:


  1. steven.shippee November 22, 2007 at 1:34 pm

    An opposing view …

    The Indian Ministry of Education dismissed the laptop as “pedagogically suspect”. Education Secretary Sudeep Banerjee said: “We cannot visualise a situation for decades when we can go beyone the pilot stage. We need classrooms and teachers more urgently than fancy tools.”
    Banerjee said if money were available it would be better spent on existing education plans.

    … that perhaps has some merit?

  2. Steven Borg November 26, 2007 at 10:45 am

    It does, however, I’d argue that attacking a problem on many fronts is often the most effective approach. In addition, I have a strong preference for approaches that do not require a state planning agency to run things. In the case of our public libraries, Andrew Carnegie made a gigantic investment in providing knowledge (in the form of books) to the majority of Americans. Those with the drive to learn then had the necessary tools at their disposal to be self taught. I believe this program is somewhat similar. It provides the tools necessary for individual achievement, even in the face of a lack of formal education. I’m sure Education Secretary Sudeep Banerjee could effectively use the money to hire additional teachers and build new schools, however I’ve seen too much aid provided directly to government agencies that has ended up being squandered. Aid closer to an individual or community level has a better chance, from my experience, of being more effectively utilized. 🙂

  3. steven.shippee December 26, 2007 at 6:18 pm

    Part of getting older is being able to admit when one’s position might not be the most correct, and after reading:

    I’m now more inclined to agree with Mr. Steven Borg. The program is getting more positive reivews and endorsements now that it has been in place for a while.

    Steven Shippee

Leave A Comment